Subject: Re: points/timing
Author: PEHA-@aol.com
Date: May 8, 2003, 10:11 AM
Post ID: 1712915703
--part1_1a1.14848640.2bebe737_boundary
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
In a message dated 5/8/2003 9:22:41 AM Pacific Daylight Time,
bcoh-@sprintmail.com writes:
| but it sounds like they were suggesting that splitting the difference (if there was some kind of minor irregularity in the lobes) was better than having the left perfect and the right off by 2 for example?. |
If you are after unobtainable perfection, that would be a good idea.
Otherwise, do the left and ignore the right.
Patrick
--part1_1a1.14848640.2bebe737_boundary
Content-Type: text/html; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
<HTML><FONT FACE=arial,helvetica><FONT SIZE=2>In a message dated 5/8/2003 9:22:41 AM Pacific Daylight Time, bcoh-@sprintmail.com writes:<BR>
<BR>
<BR>
<BLOCKQUOTE TYPE=CITE style="BORDER-LEFT: #0000ff 2px solid; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px">but it sounds like they were <BR>
suggesting that splitting the difference (if there was some kind of <BR>
minor irregularity in the lobes) was better than having the left perfect <BR>
and the right off by 2 for example?. </BLOCKQUOTE><BR>
<BR>
If you are after unobtainable perfection, that would be a good idea. Otherwise, do the left and ignore the right.<BR>
<BR>
Patrick</FONT></HTML>
--part1_1a1.14848640.2bebe737_boundary--