Subject: RE: Bike values
Author: Ian Adkins
Date: Aug 10, 2003, 12:28 PM
Post ID: 1714097100
Interesting to note that the Ambassador had a higher value than the
Eldorado. Also....these values were quite a bit lower than the Kelley Blue
Book values....which I think are more accurate.
I think that NADA may have used Mick Walker's assessment, in his book. He
said that the Ambassador was a more valuable and sought after bike based on
the prettier rear drive etc... Something like that.
Frankly....when I am asked how much my bike is worth...I simple say .. "its
worth a million to me..." :-)
-----Original Message-----
From: greg barratt [mailto:gr-@tonedeaftouring.com]
Sent: Friday, August 08, 2003 12:09 PM
To: Loopfram-@topica.com
Subject: Re: Bike values
try www.nadaguides.com for a more extensive pricing list..
----- Original Message -----
From: "Jay Williams" <cj7-@hotmail.com>
To: <Loopfram-@topica.com>
Sent: Friday, August 08, 2003 11:57 AM
Subject: Bike valueshttp://www.kbb.com/,
Don't know that it means anything, but interesting:
If you check the Kelley Blue Book site for Motorcycles,you'll see that they have listings for used motorcycles from1970 through2003. Very extensive listing of makes for most years. But for 1974 andQuite
prior, the ONLY bikes for which they chronicle values are Moto Guzzis.thoroughly, too. For 1972, for example, they seperately list theAmbassador,Police Ambassador, V-7 Sport, "regular" Eldorado, LAPD and California
versions.
Jay Williams
_________________________________________________________________
Tired of spam? Get advanced junk mail protection with MSN 8.
http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail